Case study

Tracing roof repair visits inquiries to their pages

With roof repair visits, decisions about pages can follow the data the site actually collects. The walkthrough shows measurement being established, not results being promised.

Client
Fascia, soffit and guttering installer
Region
Overland Park, Kansas
Team
4 staff; one locally managed operation
Build window
15 working days from content approval

Where the site started

The starting point

Inquiries about roof repair visits arrived with no hint of their origin. Discussions about what to improve drew on memory rather than evidence.

What it was costing the team

When it comes to roof repair visits, content reviews ran on recollection and seniority. The most-read page and the most persuasive page were assumed, wrongly, to be the same.

What we built

Each inquiry now records its originating page and service category alongside property location, visible concern and access availability. A basic report separates submitted inquiries from raw visits and keeps reporting apart from sensitive message content.

The parts of the build

  • Originating-page field
  • Service category
  • Inquiry reporting
  • Exclusion of sensitive message text

15 working days, start to handover

15 working days after content approval, including staff review and handover.

  1. Day 0

    Content approved

    The clock starts when the fascia, soffit and guttering installer signs off the wording, not at the first call.

  2. The build

    Built to the approved content

    Originating-page field and service category, built against the wording the team had already approved.

  3. Before launch

    Staff review

    The business's own staff review the work before anything goes live.

  4. Day 15

    Handover

    Live on the site, checked by the team, and handed over.

What changed

With roof repair visits, decisions about pages can follow the data the site actually collects. The walkthrough shows measurement being established, not results being promised.

Book a demo
I asked for one number: which page prompts roof repair visits contact. We finally have it, and it settled several long-running arguments.
Rowena EdgertonJobs administrator, fascia, soffit and guttering installer, Overland Park, Kansas

Questions about this build

How long did this build take?

15 working days after content approval, including staff review and handover. On a new site, each plan sets its own launch window from the onboarding call: 7 days on Deck, 10 days on Ridge, 15 days on Peak.

Which plan includes this kind of work?

Every plan. Deck, Ridge and Peak all carry the features this build used. Plans start at $127 a month, with the $697 build fee invoiced only after the site is live.

Why is the business not named?

On purpose. The client is described as a fascia, soffit and guttering installer in Overland Park, Kansas (4 staff; one locally managed operation). We never publish a client's business name, logo or web address in a case study; the quote carries the name and role of the person who said it.

Could the same thing be set up on my roofing site?

If it fits how your office works, yes. The parts used here (originating-page field, service category, inquiry reporting, exclusion of sensitive message text) are built around your own services, towns and wording, not copied from another client. A demo walks through what it would look like for your business before you commit to anything.

Want this fixed on your site?

A live walk-through of the site you would get, in about 30 minutes. Plans from $127 a month, the $697 build fee invoiced only after launch.